Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVer Information Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

AVer Information Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

COI, self-published and primary sources, promotional. Was seriously considering speedying this, but it's borderline Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 07:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete It's pure spam. And Adoil Descended (talk) 09:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. They do make a lot of claims that they've gotten awards, including several for Excellence!  I bet they got a lot of gold stars in school, too.  They call themselves a major global provider of presentation and education solutions, security surveillance solutions and video conferencing solutions, but they don't really say what these "solutions" look like.  They apparently actually make overhead presentation projectors, video cameras, and accessories.  Brimming with internal links to all the products. Probably not speedyable for insufficient claims of importance, but when the advertising is this bad, notability isn't really a consideration.  Speedily delete this without prejudice to making a proper article, focused on any technical innovation and carefully avoiding "solution" as a description of any product. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article doesn't look encyclopedic at all and nearly all the sources are the company's website. If this article were rewritten, it'd be better to start on a new slate. SwisterTwister   talk  03:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.