Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXLOIE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

AXLOIE

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject lacks in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources and current sources are just product launching announcements. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 03:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * In addition to my comment above - apart from product launching announcements most of the sources are reviews. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 03:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 03:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - The deletion reason is inaccurate. None of the sources are product launch announcements. All are independent reliable sources and there are countless articles of less notable companies on Wikipedia. Isenta (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Isenta (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * See wp:other stuff exists. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, exactly. And as it says: "When used correctly, these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes." I'm using it correctly. The standard of notability in practice is much lower than the subject of this article. Isenta (talk) 04:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - the topic does not seem to meet WP:NCORP. The article cites sources (and more, similar sources can be found online), but none contain the level of in-depth, independent coverage needed to establish the company as meeting NCORP. The large part of the sources cited are all product reviews or are press releases, and contain next-to-no information about AXLOIE itself. In addition, none of the sources cited make a credible claim for the long-term encyclopedic notability of AXLOIE when compared to similar companies, a run of the mill indication. The workaround would be to shift the focus of the article to a notable product the company sells, but in this case I doubt any individual AXLOIE product is notable enough to meet WP:NPRODUCT. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe there is enough coverage of their products for an article about one of them, but it mean the company itself should have an article. In this case there are articles that talk about the company in-depth, only their products. So, the article should be deleted as failing the notability requirements. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking the in-depth independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG, all of the coverage is from press releases/advertisements or the company itself. - Aoidh (talk) 05:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.