Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXL Guitars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 20:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

AXL Guitars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. Basic article, little encyclopaedic info, poorly referenced. created and mainly contributed to by SPAs. Absolutely nothing in terms of conferring notability. Rayman60 (talk) 23:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as I honestly consider this A7 and G11, considering it's all sourced by PR and unconvincing sources, the information itself is PR. SwisterTwister   talk  00:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- nothing but a WP:PROMO / product brochure. No RS offered on the page or at AfD, and none to be found. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Leaning delete - I can find a few reviews that indicate they're a reasonably respectable guitar company, but nothing at all else in RSes actually about the company, and that's not enough to sustain an article on the company - David Gerard (talk) 07:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.