Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A (musical note)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 00:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

A (musical note)
Delete this before somebody creates B (musical note), C sharp (musical note) and so on. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I can't find an article on scales that actually identifies the notes. If there is one, this should be redirected there. Gazpacho 00:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * How about Note? &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 15:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, like Tenor C. Kappa 02:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please as we keep the tenor article too. Yuckfoo 03:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I can find a bunch of articles with scales in them, Gazpacho, but A as a note has a place in quite a few of them. A redirect to any one of those scales doesn't make much sense. (You're right that most of the pictures do not identify the notes, though.) I vote keep for now, and if we do get too many single-note articles, we can consider merging them then, but that's nother vote-around. --Jacquelyn Marie 13:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep as well as don't worry about precedent. --Badlydrawnjeff 13:25, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep proliferation of musical note articles is not an ad infinitum problem, and the harmonics of each note are individually interesting and encyclopedic as a music and a science topic. Xoloz 15:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, its worthy of an article and its only good if an article is created about every musical note - because it could become a series of music articles, like there is a series of food articles. — Wackymacs 17:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Each food is different, but notes aren't, except in relation to one another. This is like having a separate article on each face of a die: 1 (die face), 2 (die face), etc. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 04:05, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Scale (music). There's potential here, though, so I'd lean towards keep barring a merge. PacknCanes 23:10, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.