Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A C Kadloor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

A C Kadloor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Blatant resumé and autobio with extreme undue detail. Most sources are primary. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Gaioa  (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Gaioa  (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Gaioa  (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment Does he hold office? I'm not even sure if he was elected; the article needs a rewrite in order to prove notability and for better readability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. He participated in the election to become a member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly thrice, but he did not win a seat. Therefore, he does not pass WP:NPOL. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem he has actually won any of the elections he contested, so fails WP:NPOL. Doesn't appear that he meets WP:GNG either. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL & WP:GNG. The article appears to have been created via the efforts of a sockfarm as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and a WP:PROMOTIONAL stuff only. — Amkgp 💬  18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication of nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. fails GNG. Timberlack (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sockstrike. Blablubbs | talk 20:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL for never holding elected position - also is an obvious case of WP:PROMOTIONAL. Redoryxx (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. He has not held any role that confers an automatic pass of WP:NPOL, and the article is not sourced anywhere near well enough to make him more notable than the norm for unelected political candidates or school superintendents. As always, notability is a question of demonstrating the importance of his work, not just verifying the existence of it. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:NPOL, not to mention is WP:AUTOBIO. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Prennenial political candidates, especially ones without clear indication of notability, are not notable, and should be deleted Totalstgamer (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.