Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Dose of Buckley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

A Dose of Buckley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. ... disco spinster   talk  00:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  00:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - almost all the refs are own web-site or social media and the one remaining one falls a very long way short of establishing notability. Searches reveal the same slew of social media and nothing new or notable. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 12:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable comedian.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seven of the eight footnotes are YouTube videos and other primary sources which are not support for notability, and the only one that actually comes from a real media outlet is a smalltown community hyperlocal which isn't widely distributed enough to singlehandedly get him over WP:GNG if it's the only acceptable source in play. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better sourcing than this — GNG is not just "everybody who's ever gotten their name into any newspaper on earth even once", but applies tests for depth and range and volume and context. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete As Bearcat has clearly demonstrated, the sources in the article do nothing to get Buckley over GNG. My searches in multiple databases and google news reveal nothing else that is non-primary, independent, non-trivial, and reliable. No evidence that the subject of this article. Under 1 million subscribers (550k-ish at time of writing, not verified in a secondary source) generally doesn't meet criteria 2 of WP:ENT which is the only other thing I could think of that might give this article a chance of meeting notability guidelines. Samsmachado (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The sourcing in the article is woefully inadequate. The only source remotely useable for notability is a local community paper with the rest being primary sources.  I can find nothing in my own searches to substantiate inclusion in Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about him. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.