Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Drag Queen Christmas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp  💬  04:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

A Drag Queen Christmas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete Stub article about a performance tour featuring little information about the tour, including dates and cities. Does not seem to be important enough to warrant its own article.--Donaldduckedits (talk) 04:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: Did you even search for possible sources or assess secondary coverage? So far, your argument for deletion is 1) the article is a stub and 2) the subject "does not seem to be important enough". Neither are valid reasons for deletion. The tour has run for four years and there are plenty of sources confirming specific dates and reviewing specific performances. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, on the surface this might seem unlikely but these tours by a cast of notable people, is essentially like a rock tour. Every stop gets at least a handful of media write-ups, and that it has repeated suggests they’re also getting reviews which can fill out an entire reception section.This needs work but WP:DINC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BEFORE step D. There's a lot of routine coverage because it's a touring show, but there's significant coverage mixed in there as well. I think it satisfies the WP:GNG.
 * Miami New Times (December 2019) - substantial coverage of lineup and historical context of the show.
 * Church Militant (December 2019) - prominent Christian nationalist website covers the details of the performance itself and responds exactly as you'd expect
 * Columbia Chronicle (November 2019) - student newspaper writer provides review and critical commentary on the show with coverage of the themes and artistic choices behind them
 * Slate (February 2018) - contains coverage of controversies surrounding the 2016 tour and places that controversy in wider context
 * The Georgia Voice (December 2017) - covers the tour as a whole and places it in historical context
 * Richmond Times-Dispatch (November 2017) - in 2017 the primary daily newspaper of Richmond, Virginia found it significant enough to send a reporter to interview one of the headliners
 * Coverage in multiple regions, from multiple perspectives, across multiple tours suggests this is notable. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, sorry buddy but this is a lazy delete nomination. A quick search shows there is relevant coverage. Before nominating an article for deletion, you have a responsibility to search for sources first per the AFD process. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{  Talk  }- 09:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources identified by Wugapodes. — Toughpigs (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. WP:BEFORE does not seem to have been done. A simple Google search yields numerous RS that can be used to expand the article, as Wugapodes showed above with several good examples. Nom rationale is not WP:PAG-based, either. Armadillopteryxtalk 14:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * SNOW Keep per everyone's seemingly easy finds to show sourcesWP:NEXIST. −2pou (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.