Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Drop of Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

A Drop of Love

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Spam created by an editor for payment. Most of the coverage is marked as "news desk" or is made-up (press releases/paid for articles which newspapers never maintain in their archives - that's why they are citing pictures uploaded to Internet Archives - smart work). ROTM awards, fails WP:SIGCOV. Michalis Andreou (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with above, it's all spammy SEO type links, I find no sources. Oaktree b (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As always, films do not all get an automatic free pass over WP:NFILM just because they exist — they have to show evidence of significance, supported by WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage. But the only notability claim being attempted here is film awards from minor film festivals, referenced to their own self-published websites about themselves or the filmmaker's paid promotional press releases rather than proper media coverage to establish the notability of said festivals, and the rest of the sourcing just ain't cutting it otherwise. Even "film notable because awards" still requires the awards to be notable awards. Bearcat (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.