Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Happy Healthy You


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

A Happy Healthy You

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable topic. The references do not establish notability.

Side notes: the article is promotional in tone. The  Cascadian  03:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 25.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 03:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This article reads more like an advertisement found in a magazine than an article containing useful information about a book. Szsmr (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete It's very adverty and lacks reliable third-party sources. Even if it is notable (and that's doubtful) it needs a complete rewrite so best to delete.  W a g g e r s  TALK  12:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'm in the process of trying to clean this, but so far it's not very promising. Part of the issue is that from my experience, Foreword isn't really usable as a RS because people pay to get them written. Per their website, you can pay $500 to get a Clarion review through them. Even the non-paid reviews are sort of suspect because of this (as I seem to remember that the site still tends to ask for money through various other means), but since this wasn't a non-paid review it's sort of a moot point to discuss it. I've removed it from the article because of this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe salt. After searching a little more, I was unable to find anything other than the one newspaper source that's on the article. This just isn't a notable enough book to merit inclusion. Since this is the third incarnation of the page, there's a chance that this might be re-created, although I note that the previous versions were made back in 2010. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.