Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Hope for Home


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 23:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

A Hope for Home

 * – ( View AfD View log )

does not meet the notability criteria for bands Dartroom (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - A Hope for Home does in fact meet the notability criteria for bands, item number 5 of WP:BAND. They have realeased two albums on the record labels Facedown Records and Strike First (the imprint label of Facedown Records) "an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are notable"

http://facedownrecords.com/2009/11/02/a-hope-for-home/

http://facedown.merchnow.com/products/97826

Facedown Records has a history of more than a few years, and has a roster with many notable artists that also have wikipedia articles (A Plea for Purging, Hope for the Dying, In the Midst of Lions, War of Ages).

They also meet item number 1 of the notability criteria for musicians and ensembles, in that they have album reviews and interviews here:

http://puregrainaudio.com/interviews/interview-with-a-hope-for-home-guitarist-and-vocalist-matt-ellis

http://thrashmag.com/interviews/content.aspx?id=2649

http://www.indievisionmusic.com/2009/01/21/a-hope-for-home-the-everlasting-man-review/

http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=1618762

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/36913/A-Hope-For-Home-Realis/

http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/Realis.asp

MatthewCJones (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:BAND, having released multiple albums on a major label.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 20:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Appears to meet WP:BAND. The nomination does not indicate why the nominator believes the band does not meet WP:BAND. Rlendog (talk) 00:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.