Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A K Chenoweth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

A K Chenoweth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I really don't think the subject of this classic vanity article is notable. TheLongTone (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with your assessment that this is probably an autobiography. She's certainly a lot more accomplished than many people who write their own Wikipedia articles (or pay other people to do so). I'm leaning pretty strongly towards delete, as the sources used are either minor publications or only mention her tangentially. If there's some yet-to-be digitalised paper in Northern Ireland that has written a few indepth articles about her I would reconsider, but it seems unlikely. &#161;Bozzio&#33; 15:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, added women project to the article talkpage so participants are notified of this afd.Coolabahapple (talk) 06:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable PR person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.