Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A M Nair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure), as per general consensus. Notability of the individual has been been satisfactorily established. Hence, the claim that the article could be a hoax has been disproved. Ravichandar My coffee shop 18:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

A M Nair

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced (wp:v, wp:blp), and it looks like a hoax after a Google search for "Ayyappanpillai Madhavan Nair". -- Jeandré, 2008-06-21t09:23z 09:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Keep, is a well-known personality in Kerala. Tintin 04:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Google search for nair san and nairsan gives more. Has written an autobiography on which is based an upcoming movie, Nairsan. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO, no reliable sources. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 13:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - and expand. There are enough notations of the man's existence online to allow expansion.Wjhonson (talk) 04:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep.       . Those are just some of the sources available a couple of mouse clicks away, many of which refer to a feature film being made about the subject, which is an explicit notability criterion of WP:BIO.  Phil Bridger (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Obviously, he's likely going to be the subject of a major film co-starring Jackie Chan, that's beside all the other references in books and newspapers he gets, clearly an influential historical figure. RMHED (talk) 20:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The arguments above are completely decisive for keeping. What more is there to say?John Z (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Bridger's sources above. Notable.  Renee (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.