Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Manual Dexterity - DVD (due out 2006)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  T 00:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

A Manual Dexterity - DVD (due out 2006)
This was linked from the article Omar Rodriguez-Lopez as a movie that he will produce in 2006. The Rodriguez-Lopez article indicates that the movie has been postponed indefinitely, and this site says that "either no one knows anything about this project, or they just aren't willing to say." The songwriter did drop an album in 2005 that claims to be the first half of the movie's soundtrack, but we already have an article for it here.

Whether the movie is true or not, I'm nominating this article for deletion because it is non-notable and future-predicting. An article is warranted when and if the movie comes out. -D. Wu 16:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT crystal ball &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP is not a crystal ball JoJan 18:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Notability shouldn't be conflated with verifiability. The issue here is not notability but verifiability.  If there is no available knowledge on a subject, because it doesn't yet exist, then the article is unverifiable.  However, there is (and has been for several years) knowledge about the movie A Manual Dexterity to be had.  Wikipedia can certainly cover the reports from sources that such a movie is planned, and by whom, even though there is nothing known about the movie itself.  See here, here, and here, for examples.  But this article contains nothing of use, is completely unsourced, is partially speculative, and is at the wrong title anyway. Delete. Uncle G 21:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Even if we do need an article about this, the article's title shouldn't include "due out 2006".--Atlantima 00:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.