Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Meadowcrest Apothecary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

A Meadowcrest Apothecary

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is about an unreleased film that fails to establish notability, but more importantly, fails verifiability. A search for the title in quotes on Google web shows only the wikipedia article as its only search result. A search on IMDB fails to turn up an entry by tis title despite its tentative release date of January 2009. The article was proposed for deletion but the PROD was removed by the original author without addressing the lack of sources, although an external link to the film company's blog was added. Whpq (talk) 02:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's investigation and rationale.Synchronism (talk) 02:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 03:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability has not been established - Boston (talk) 03:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. With respects to article author Thefoote9, and the film's writer director Aaron Pifer-Foote, there is just not enough available for the film to show notability. Get it made. Get it to festivals. Get some press coverage. Then we can re-evaluate.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.