Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Motley Vision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

A Motley Vision

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This isn't a notable blog. The only sources are the blog itself. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 04:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Literature, Film, Christianity,  and Websites.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. jps (talk) 13:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article has existed for 16 years and has no reliable sources to establish its significance. Jessintime (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The nominator has misstated the facts. Two of the sources are the blog itself, one is the Association of Mormon Letters, and one is something else (but I'm not sure what it is supposed to be referencing). Counterfeit Purses (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The Association of Mormon Letters is not a source that we should be using to bestow notability on a blog. jps (talk) 15:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Why not? Thmazing (talk) 23:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of significant coverage, no evidence of notability. Not appropriate for an encyclopedia. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.