Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A New Ascension (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

A New Ascension
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced for 4 years. First AFD in 2006 closed as no consensus pending improvements to the entry, which are still lacking more than 3 years later. The entry itself points out that this band has almost never performed; the only thing resembling a claim to notability is a couple licenensing deals for background music. Hairhorn (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'd say the prior AFD was closed with the hope that the article creator could improve the article and establish notability. There was no real evidence for notability during the first AFD that I can discern.  The claim of coverage is press clippings from local papers.  My own search does not show that this band has any significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.