Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A New Theory of Magnetic Storms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Geomagnetic storm. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

A New Theory of Magnetic Storms

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was PRODed. From a cursory glance, it looks like it this is a somewhat highly-cited publication, so I'm bringing it to AfD for greater scrutiny. At the moment, I have no opinion on whether this should be kept or not. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this comes nowhere near the importance of the other items in Category:Physics papers; the substance of it would fit in Sydney Chapman. (And, of course, "113 days" was wrong.) /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Geomagnetic storm. This is just part of the history of that subject. JRSpriggs (talk) 02:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per Pieter Kuiper or JRSpriggs. We generally only keep the most important, groundbreaking scientific articles as their own articles. Bearian (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.