Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Peace of Jerusalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete Mkativerata (talk) 00:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

A Peace of Jerusalem

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about an online document that purports to provide an "evolving 'way forward' proposal which aims to advance the cause of peace in the Middle East." The title has no Google News hits, and the Google Web hits that I see look to me like the result of first-party promotion. This article, too, is, I believe, a case of first-party promotion. None of the cited sources mention the document, other than the document itself. My view is that this is a document of no import, and that it would not be possible to find third-party sources to sustain an article about it. Delete as non-notable. Hesperian 00:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No contest. Imahd (talk) 02:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable plan and per article creator's consent to deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a work in progress, not very notable until it is adopted by some major organizations and/or parties to the ongoing peace process. GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No source in the article except the URL of the document itself even mentions it. Article obviously only exists to promote the document.  Should have been speedied.  Zerotalk 10:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as having no coverage in independent reliable sources, but without prejudice to reinstating the article if and when the initiative becomes known. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.