Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Play Entitled Sehnsucht


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

A Play Entitled Sehnsucht

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod denied. Film has no second party coverage and thus is not notable per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 12:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relevant discussion with the editor who created this article can be found here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Although verifiable as existing, this Lebanese film has no sourcability notability. I was going to suggest a redirect to ts writer/director Badran Roy Badran, but in looking, I determine that his article is itself an unsourcable BLP violation ready for AFD. In fact... in looking, I think I will nominate that one myself.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Done... and for me, a VERY rare event.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:57, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not fulfill notability. MQS has nominated Badran Roy Badran for deletion, but Celine Abiad should be nominated as well.  All three articles were written by the same editor, who also added every mention of the film, director and producer on en.Wiki (raising possibly WP:COI problems), and all have the same lack of notability.  Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relevant discussion with the editor who created this article can be found here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Per the linked discussion, I am not adverse to this be userfied... just so long as the author understands WP:COI and our requirement for WP:V and WP:RS, and that this is not to be simply "stored" in his userspace indefinitely.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I agree with MQS's conditions regarding userfication, with the additional caveat that any copyright violation in the article be removed or cleared up via OTRS before userfication. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.