Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Pocket for Corduroy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

A Pocket for Corduroy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG Finlan Bendbow-Rendeck (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The original book is a children's classic, and this had a short film released about it. Nom obviously failed to do WP:BEFORE, as this passes GNG easily.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Manifestly notable. It's a children's book with a JSTOR and Google Scholar presence, for heaven's sake. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources support that WP:NBOOK is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It seems to meet notability guidelines and I added another review. BuySomeApples (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It is notable based on film and sources. Kakara69 (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.