Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Pound of Flesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

A Pound of Flesh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I couldn't find even one review or news story. The linked articles don't go to the correct people. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 17:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, Thought it was a hoax at first glance, still not convinced it isn't. Nothing found in search that wasn't self-published.   Wikipelli Talk   18:14, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:V.--Milowent • hasspoken 06:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete can't verify it either. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 12:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm finding quite a lot of non-RS for Tony Urban - if this is a hoax, someone's really gone to town. On the other hand, a budget of $38,000 with a cast of ten plus three named team members (in the IMDb details) doesn't give much of a pay packet, let alone cover much in the way of costs even at 2004 prices. All the cast bar two are redlinked (the other two are not even linked), as is the producer. I get the feeling that this and his other listed pictures are attempts to get noticed, and make use of the great pool of would-bes that are desperate enough to work for peanuts (or nowt...) in order to get something on their CVs. The 'production company' Crazy Ralph Films is basically Tony Urban, and the distributor Mountain Eye has one other film in its IMDb entry. Peridon (talk) 13:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've declined the speedy on the grounds that there is evidence for existence - albeit in non-reliable sources. This is the place for considering it. Peridon (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree there's no need for a speedy here. I didn't draw a conclusion on the hoax claim myself. Typically a hoax claim would not have as many sources (albeit non-RS) and an imdb page, and a low budget film from 2004 may not have any surviving on-line press coverage, theoretically.  Film Threat has one reference to an actor appearing in it in passing, and that's a good source on obscure films, but its not clear that Film Threat vetted the existence of it.--Milowent • hasspoken  17:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Another passing reference to an actor in the film here . Interestingly (or not) one of the actresses (according to her website) is now appearing in Mad Men. Still, nothing notable found.   Wikipelli Talk   20:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Probably not a hoax (based on similar findings as Peridon), but very probably non-notable as I'm finding zero coverage in reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:NF.  Gongshow  Talk 05:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.