Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Puritan's Mind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

A Puritan's Mind

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Closest thing to an RS I found was this, which repeats some of what's on this wiki article. I can't tell if they both came from an older version of the website or what. Anyway, PublishAmerica is a vanity press. JFH (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for now My Google searches showed that this organization is fairly active, and its publications are cited in other books and articles. What's missing is any secondary coverage about it. In the future an article probably could be written but not now by WP:Notability. Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * isn't that incubation criteria? romnempire (talk) 22:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe. I don't know how that works. Kitfoxxe (talk) 03:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * See WP:AI #3 & 5. It seems to me to only apply where there is reason to believe RSes actually exist, but are not readily available. I don't think it's likely there will ever be RSes on this, but someone needs to give a reason that this topic is so important it should be kept and for the fact that no one has been able to find RSes. --JFH (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- This looks to me like yet another one-man ministry. I note no link to the founder, which strengthens my view that it is probably NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.