Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A S Murty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   ''' Article was deleted due to copyright issues that went unaddressed for more than 7 days. Administrative closure without prejudice to relist in case of recreation of an article that addresses the copyright issues, as no consensus was reached at the time of closure.' MLauba (Talk)'' 11:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

A S Murty

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Speedied, but is the CTO of a notable(?) corporation, Mahindra Satyam. I don't feel comfortable deleting this without AFD support. delete' UtherSRG (talk) 12:29, 20 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 16:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - He was briefly the CEO after the scandal hit and received substantial coverage in the media then. --Sodabottle (talk) 04:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Regardless of notability, the article is in violation of our copyright policy and will need to be deleted or rewritten, unless permission is verified, as it has been copied from http://www.nitorsolutions.com/corporate/boardmembers.asp. It has been accordingly blanked and listed at the copyright problems board, as the contributor has been advised how to verify. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.