Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Sailor Went to Sea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

A Sailor Went to Sea

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article had been prodded but article creator left a note on talk page indicating deletion is not uncontroversial. Original prod rationale by was that it fails WP:IINFO.

For my part, I also say delete per original prod nom. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: WP:GNG. Cited and reported in numerous books, examples:, , including an Oxford University Press book , and subject of academic papers. The article is just a stub, but sources can be found for improving it. -- Cycl o pia talk  18:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Cyclopia. - 70.27.31.10 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: Not a good article currently, but I think notability can be established. --Korruski (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.