Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Second Birth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

A Second Birth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any SNG for plays, but this would fail WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Most of the sources in the article are either connected to the playwrite, or are listings; I can't find any non-UGC reviews online; the awards listed don't appear to be notable (we do not have articles on any of them); the article makes not claims to notability under any other criteria. (Note: I already removed and requested revdel on a chunk of the content from the first paragraph which was copy/pasted from one of the sources, so as it stands it's a little sparse). Girth Summit  (blether) 18:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of third party reliable source coverage. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Note: I am working with the nominator on new page patrol but came to this assessment independently.
 * Keep (Author of article) Addressed items raised in notice for deletion (newly written overview submitted which includes description of cultural significance; additional references supporting significance of awards added; additional internal wiki links added) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knight without armor (talk • contribs) 01:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The additional reference is to a review on a blog site (Utah Theater Bloggers Association) -it's WP:UGC, so it doesn't satisfy the WP:GNG notability concern. The links added lead to our article on the college festival which gives out numerous awards - I don't think that they would count as 'major literary awards' for the purposes of WP:NBOOK. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. None of the references in the article a quality RS.  The only mention that I can find of this play is here, which is not a quality ref.  Author of the play also does not screen well for notability.  The awards are not in themselves notable. Maybe this play will become notable, but currently it is not. Britishfinance (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.