Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Shepard of Pure Heart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

A Shepard of Pure Heart

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Related to this AfD. This is sort of a pre-emptive strike to prevent re-creation (something the article creator has done before). Therefore, I'm removing the prods and bumping this up to an AfD. From my prod: "No indication of notability." The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, re-adding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that they may have an IP sockpuppet), bringing to light that every film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 21:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article's creator made a mistake in the name. This search for A Shepherd of Pure Heart turns up some plausible references. Notability can sometimes be concealed by a creator's imperfect spelling. If the article is kept, it should be moved to the correct spelling. - Eastmain (talk) 00:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Of the 8 hits returned by the above query, one was an ad to find actors for the movie, the other ones were merely announcements by the local press about the premiere being shown where the action takes place. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I also tried the search with both spellings and could not find any notability; fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Perhaps Eastmain should have actually looked at the eight links his search turned up. All of them are trivial - either listings of screening times and venues which WP:NOTFILM specifically and explicitly debars or casual mentions.  Honestly, I prefer that lectures about taking the trouble to do a little research be prefaced by a little research.    Ravenswing  07:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice toward recreation. One might hope it has reviews in Christian sources, but even under the proper spelling I have not found them yet.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.