Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Sweet Spot in Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

A Sweet Spot in Time

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable film, conflict of interest BOVINEBOY 2008 21:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Could you please explain what could make it 'notable'? Thank you very much. I'd love to work with you to keep this page up. MrBean65 (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, could you please explain to me what makes a notable film? Thanks! MrBean65 (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * User:MrBean65 see WP:NFILM. Jinkinson   talk to me  23:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Start by citing some actual coverage in real reliable sources — the only "references" you've cited here aren't that. Bearcat (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete at this point in time there just isn't any coverage out there for this film. It'll release in a few days and if it gains that coverage before the AfD close date then I'll change my opinion, but offhand it doesn't really look like it will gain much coverage based on the little to no coverage it has received so far. This isn't a rule, mind you, but generally speaking the less coverage/talk there is about a film prior to its release the less likely it will be that a film will receive in reliable sources once it's released. That this film is by a 14 year old filmmaker may make it more likely that it'd gain coverage, but it's not a guarantee. (I'm going by the information at the now deleted article Jonah Bryson.) On a side note, please be aware that even though the documentary will feature notable people, that does not give notability in and of itself. (WP:NOTINHERITED) You will also need to be careful in how you state their involvement, ie- whether they're speaking directly to the director or if he used archived footage from various talks they gave. That's mostly an aside for how you describe this at IMDb or any other location in general, since you don't want people to say that the descriptions are misleading. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Also,, I'm concerned that we have had multiple accounts try to create pages for Bryson in various forms or functions. If you are the same user as User:Jonah.bryson2 or User:Jonah Bryson you need to just state this on your userpage and give somewhat of an explanation as to why you have a new account. It's not uncommon to have people create new accounts due to losing passwords, but we do need some sort of explanation since sometimes we'll have people try to make pages with new accounts in order to try to avoid detection. This somewhat concerned me since you created a page for Bryson at Jonah Bryson (Filmmaker & Musician) as opposed to just Jonah Bryson and each time someone has tried to create a page for him or his stuff, it's been with a brand new account. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: In the past this film also existed at A Sweet Spot in Time (film). If this is deleted I would recommend that this not be re-added by anyone involved with the film production or with Bryson until an experienced editor OKs the page. TBH, I'd recommend that you just request it from another editor and let them create it since this seems to be a habit: create the page, it gets deleted, a new account gets opened and a new attempt is made. At some point this stops being an honest attempt to create a page and starts resembling self-promotion and could be seen as disruptive to the point where blocking may become necessary. I will say that I'm going to salt all but the basic pages (Jonah Bryson and this page's name) to discourage recreation at those pages. And again, I would highly discourage recreating any pages for Bryson or his work at this point in time until or unless you do it via an experienced editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.