Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Symposium of Six Perspectives on the Archaic Religious Period


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

A Symposium of Six Perspectives on the Archaic Religious Period

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Despite references and other appearances to the contrary, this is not an encyclopedia article, it is written like an essay or college paper, comparing 6 different views on a particular subject. I have thought long and hard about whether it can be rescued, but the basic problem is that such a "symposium" is not an encyclopedic subject, it is original research. ukexpat (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The main author of the article is rewritting it in the required encyclopedia format. Deleting now will simplify in putting up a new version.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jina2 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. It looks like WP:SYNTHESIS to me. Disavian (talk) 02:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Disavian. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Much of the information would be useful as sources in other articles, but it's blatant WP:SYNTH here. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.