Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Wet Dream on Elm Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

A Wet Dream on Elm Street

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of mainstream notability. The only independent reference (www.videotramp.com) is a review site for porn. 1292simon (talk) 22:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn due to improvements by Right Cite. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a work with insuffiicent 3rd party coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, identified in The 10 Best Porn Films Since 2010, and covered in Sex and Sexuality in Modern Screen Remakes (2019), Horror Film: A Critical Introduction (2018), Torture Porn: Popular Horror after Saw (2013). Right cite (talk) 13:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 02:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 02:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: Article improved, removed all prior sources used in the article when originally nominated for deletion, (see improved version of the article after the research). Thank you for taking another look, Right cite (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:HEY Donaldd23 (talk) 04:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per 's research. No issue with nom, notability was not clear at the time.      StarM 14:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:HEY. No longer the same article as was nominated. /Julle (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Right cite's work. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep based on Right cite's additions. — Toughpigs (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's research. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's expansion. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.