Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Woman's Liberation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As notability has been established since the nomination. Davewild (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

A Woman&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable collection of short stories. Mikeblas (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The stories are all award-winning, but I could find no evidence indicating that this particular anthology containing them is independently notable. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: It took me a while and I was surprised to find them, but ultimately there were reviews for this anthology. There aren't a ton, but it's enough for it to pass NBOOK. I also found mentions of it here and there, notably in a journal review for the teaching book Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction, where the reviewer comments that she is teaching a class on the topic and is also using this anthology to supplement her course. I also found evidence of it being used in a college course at San Diego State University. In any case, it does look like it's enough for this to pass notability guidelines for the most part. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help, Tokyogirl! -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  13:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Coverage in reliable secondary sources meets WP:NOTE. Thanks. Safehaven86 (talk) 16:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.