Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A and WMA Environmental Compliance News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

A and WMA Environmental Compliance News

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Cannot even find a homepage for this. Not mentioned on Elsevier websites. Article was de-PRODded and some references were added that prove that, once upon a time, it existed. However, apart from some mentions in library catalogs, no independent sources are available. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. It is a newsletter from a non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete because this publication does not meet any notability criteria. Also there is no proof of its current existence and it does not have any notable history either. I have found two library source that say it is published by Elsevier, . At least one indicates that Elsevier publishes on behalf of another organzation. However, these sources may actually be dated or simply catalog pages for an archived publication no longer in existence. Even the Air & Waste Management Association web site does not mention this "newsletter" or whatever it is supposed to be , . Steve Quinn (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.