Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A brife look at sea salt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: moved back to userspace, User:Liushiye/sandbox, by User:Philg88. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

A brife look at sea salt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This student essay covers a topic that already exists on Wikipedia: sea salt. There is no need for a separate article. Some of the content might be incorporated into the existing article, but much of the content of this article involves poorly sourced dubious medical claims. Referencing health benefit claims to clickbait articles hosted on websites such as stylecraze.com, healingnaturallybybee.com, smallfootprintfamily.com, etc. are clear violations of WP:MEDRS. This article should never have been moved out of draft space. Edgeweyes (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this suggests anything convincing to have as a separate article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Never will be accepted as an article. Subliterate (like ionized for iodized, not to mention brife). Xxanthippe (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC).
 * Strong Delete. Per nom. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. We already have an article about sea salt. If the author wants to add information about different varieties of sea salt, that information should probably be included at sea salt per WP:PAGEDECIDE. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A10 duplication of topic. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Moot I think this has all moved back into userspace. I fear I may have done something bogus on the final move, though. Not quite sure what. :-/ Pinkbeast (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.