Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A mermaid story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 03:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

A mermaid story

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject is a not yet published (or even finished) story. Article fails to establish notability. — Twinzor Say hi! 23:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:BK. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability outside of author's head.  Graymornings (talk) 00:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  17:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under G6. Some one's personal advertisement for their own "book" and creator has now blanked the article. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 17:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No, the author didn't request deletion; the author accidentally quoted out the entire article. I have fixed it so that the article is now visible again. MuZemike  ( talk ) 21:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Really, don't we have speedy delete for articles like this? It's kind of a waste of time to hold a vote on whether a badly written paragraph of random babble violates policy or not. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — not verifiable. MuZemike  ( talk ) 21:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Given the author is supposedly anonymous (per the first version of the article), it's really difficult to sort out which ghits on "A mermaid story" might be for this one. Given the article, though, it sounds unpublished, which means without a few solidly credible references, this does not pass WP:BK at this time. Delete without prejudice for recreation after publication and subsequent popularity. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyoneDandy Sephy (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.