Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A nightmare on elm street prequel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 01:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

A nightmare on elm street prequel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There has been no reliable source confirming this film's development for creation. Regardless, per WP:FILM, this would be included at the franchise article, as it would only be in the talk phase. Fails WP:NOTE, WP:V, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NOR...just about anything you can think of given the fact that there are no sources to confirm a single sentence or word on the page (except maybe who will distribute it and what film it follows).  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nevermind that the title breaks naming convention. I wouldn't merge or redirect it until some sort of confirmation is given that the film is more than just rumor. Delete it for now. Yng  varr  19:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails just about every acid test of Wikipedia articles; no reliable sources, no context, no verifiable content... yeah. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ten Pound Hammer. WP:CRYSTAL is the obvious one to go for here, but this isn't really an article, it's a sentance. As I say to all crystal-balling: if and when it comes out, write the article then. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above reasons.    Paul    730  20:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:FILM, etc. Even if this might become a film, there’s not enough information to warrant a whole article dedicated to it. — Travis talk  20:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and probable hoax. D.M.N. (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, crystal-ball-ism, zero content, incorectly capitalized, there's nothing right about this article. --Stormie (talk) 01:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Crap! Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.