Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A phone call is worth a thousand emails


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

A phone call is worth a thousand emails
Contested Prod. An expression "coined on July 19th, 2006". WP:NFT. Fan-1967 02:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original prodder. Someone got lost on the way to his blog. Opabinia regalis 02:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note Author just vandalized this AFD. Fan-1967 02:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete A saying by an unknown author doesn't merit a place . who is this 'the juice' giusti. seems like a mafia henchman--Ageo020 02:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment pls don't cast disparity's around about peoples user-names, be civil!-- Librarianofages 02:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete this protologism. GassyGuy 04:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear WP:NFT and WP:NEO. -- H·G (words/works) 04:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism -- Alias Flood 04:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism made up one day. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 04:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NEO -- Evan  Robidoux  07:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 07:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:NEO. Voice of Treason 09:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly a non-notable neologism. Lacks any sources so unverifiable. Gwernol 11:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Article was created by a total newbie who was completely clueless about this kind of thing. Participants here should please take WP:BITE to heart.  The messages left on the poor guy's talk page were quite unwelcoming.  Obviously the article is inappropriate (unencyclopedic) but the person should have gotten a friendlier note explaining the problem.  I left a welcome template but maybe there's a more suitable one.  Phr (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article's creator, The Juice, vandalized this AfD and attacked Fan-1967 twice for putting the article up for deletion EX1 / EX2. The reply on his talk page came after the vandalism and first attack. Voice of Treason 03:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for obvious reasons Just zis Guy you know? 12:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and yes, let us not forget WP:BITE. Civily explaining WP:NEO and why a protologism is not appropriate for Wikipedia would have been the logical first step.--Isotope23 12:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. It appears the vandalism happened before the the WP:BITE. --DarkAudit 14:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. RandyWang ( raves/rants ) 14:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, WP:NEO and WP:NFT; maybe WP:SNOW this. -- Kinu t /c  15:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because, while some may nod in agreement, it's still a neologism. Doogie2K (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete coined on July 19th, 2006 by Johnny "the Juice" Giusti. Neil916 22:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything above. R.E. Freak 02:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment to Fan-1967: please see WP:BITE about referring to a newcomer as a WP:VANDAL. User:The Juice, maybe through error, or maybe with some unknown type of intention, removed a comment and an early delete vote, a very big no-no in a discussion like this.  He hasn't made any other edits to the afd up to now.  To The Juice: please feel free to participate here, i.e. add your own vote and any comments that you want to share; but don't remove or edit stuff added by other people--that's frowned upon in almost every circumstances.  (Note, that applies to discussion pages only.  Article pages can in general be edited by anyone in any way, at any time).  -- Phr (talk) 03:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You're right. I jumped too quickly. When the nomination comments were removed my first reaction was vandalism rather than ignorance, and I should have reacted more calmly. Fan-1967 12:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as neologism. TedTalk/Contributions 05:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -Royalguard11Talk 22:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.