Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakaash Bangla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to Akash Bangla. Article already exists, and sources for the target appear to exist. Suggest that this is a cleanup operation for the target article. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Aakaash Bangla

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable television network, advertising, no claims of notability, no references. My speedy delete tag was removed. Corvus cornix talk  23:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

*Delete Per nom. (As usual, I hate to say that, but there is really nothing else to add.) J.delanoy gabs adds  23:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect I was not aware that there was another article with such a similar name in existance. J.delanoy gabs adds  14:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable and unreferenced, but it's hardly advertising. The only claims that could've been made for that were some badly chosen words, but that can be fix't easily.  Cheers.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 02:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  02:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nice example of why NOTE is broken. An article on an entire network can be put up for AfD in good faith because the network broadcasts in some language we don't speak (Bangla).  More of a reason to delete parts of NOTE than this article. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I resent your attacks, and request that you retract them.  Corvus cornix  talk  15:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to attack you, and I'm sorry. I know you are acting in good faith. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete As the article stands it has no assertion of notability, no verifiable third party sourcing. If policies or guidelines somewhere state that all stations are automatically notable (and I've missed it) than change the "D" to a "K". And for the record I'd "vote" the same way on an article with similar content even if they broadcast in English.Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is the title spelled differently from the usual? There seems to be plenty of references for a TV channel called Akash Bangla. -- Whpq (talk) 12:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Akash Bangla, which has a very good article. Kudos to Whpq for thinking "outside the box" on this one. Mandsford (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.