Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakash Institute (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Specialpage (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Aakash Institute
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy delete queried by a message in my talk page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

KEEP: I do not agree with the nominator because, article is well-referenced with third party reliable sources. It meets Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. The article was speedy deleted under G11: Unambiguous advertising or by nominator without informing or leaving a message on my (creator's) talk page, which itself a violation of Wikipedia's deletion policy and it looks bit suspicious as well. Let's assume even if article was promotional in nature, I believe, instead of deleting the article, it could have been fixed as per FIXIT. Later on my request, article was undeleted. I found, some issues were pointed out by new user, which i have FIXED. What was the issue in article? Business Standard reported in 2012 that the institute was bullshit about its online offerings but instead of writing it bullshit i wrongly made it bullish by auto-spell check, that made the article promotional. Bullshit (means stupid, poor, worthless or rubbish) and Bullish (means aggressively confident and self-assertive) is totally two different words with different meaning. An other problem was pointed is undue weight about an award mentioned in article. But i find it appropriate to mention as it was reported by Hindustan Times, but if anyone think it is inappropriate, feel free to remove, it's not a problem. If anyone still think, the article is promotional, please help to fix it.--Elton-Rodrigues 10:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Page Aakash Institute was speedy-delete-tagged at 10:42, 8 June 2017‎ by User:Specialpage. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this to my notice. I thought you are the one who nominated and deleted the article. It is HOAX nomination, where new user User:Specialpage is purposefully vandalized the article and nominated it for speedy deletion, even without leaving a message on my talk page, which itself a vioalation of deletion policy and deletion process. The account User:Specialpage seems to be created with single purpose that is to delete this article. It has hardly any or no contribution to Wikipedia. Please take this into consideration. --Elton-Rodrigues 14:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 *  DELETE : Please see these deletion logs of a similar article.  I want to further add that the &ldquo;well-referenced [and] third party reliable sources&rdquo; that the article cites are category articles from online news channels. Such newspapers are known to publish short articles on any and every local event that they come to know of, newsworthy or not. As such, these references alone cannot indicate the noteworthiness of the subject matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.102.219.116 (talk) 11:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@{ping|185.102.219.116}, A baseless point, the article is supported and information in article are verifiable by reliable sources. These sources are not from any local publication, but from reputed and mainstream media houses in India. The article has significant media coverage that is too in depth. Your claim is false. I would have appreciated if you had participated in discussion by using your own account (identity), instead of using IP address. By providing deletion log of recently deleted article (FIITJEE deleted on 8 June 2017) with similar category, you have proved my suspicions right. By creating new accounts (possibly socks) [example:User:Specialpage] and using IP addresses, there are some individuals or someone who hoaxing and vandalizing WP for their purpose and purposefully trying to delete articles, which is wrong and violation of Wikipedia policy. They do not bother themselves to leave a message on creator's talk page, which itself a violation of deletion policy and deletion process. Let me investigate and confirm everything from authorize sources. --Elton-Rodrigues 20:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.