Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Atta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, I found wjemather's contribution the most persuasive in amongst a general consensus for deletion. Daniel (talk) 11:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Aamer Atta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage found. Störm  (talk)  01:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has played 8 games at the highest domestic level. StickyWicket (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago, I reminded this editor about the closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not cricketpedia. The article totally 100% fails GNG. It is time we stopped keeping such rubbish articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails basic notability criteria WP:N. Wikipedia is not...WP:NOT. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 20:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Too short and not notable.Illuminator123 (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject trivially passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability that is very unreliable for cricketers such as these (recent NSPORT discussion here), but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases; no suitable list to merge into. wjematherplease leave a message... 12:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete in the absence of a suitable list or redirect to. Trivial pass of NCRIC but failure of GNG. Played a few matches across a short period, but the chances of finding suitable sources seems very limited. If there were then I might expect to see them on an article on the Urdu language version of Wikipedia, but he has no article there. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.