Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Hameed (cricketer, born 1969)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Aamer Hameed (cricketer, born 1969)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage found. Störm  (talk)  01:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago, I reminded this editor about the closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete totally fails GNG which is the minimum standard for all articles. Any article that fails to meet GNG should be deleted. We need to stop propping up junk articles like this one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete meeting a SNG like WP:NCRIC is ok for article creation but even it says notability is presumed which means it can be rebutted. This is the fact here. The subject does not meet notability criteria found in WP:N which means it should not be included. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 20:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject trivially passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability that is very unreliable for cricketers such as these (recent NSPORT discussion here), but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases; no suitable list to merge into. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the growing, indeed fully grown, consensus that sportspersons who only played 1 game of their sport do not satisfy Wikipedia guidelines, if not that game was especially noteworthy. Geschichte (talk) 08:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of a suitable list or redirect to. Trivial pass of NCRIC but failure of GNG and no suggestion that there is much of a chance of finding more in depth sources given his short career. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.