Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Ilyas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Aamer Ilyas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No coverage found, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  14:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete not even remotely close to meeting GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. According to the stat database cited in the article, Ilyas made only a single first-class appearance. Moreover, the article provides zero sourcing beyond the statistical database. Such databases are insufficient to show that a player passes WP:GNG. The nom's searches (as well as my searches) have turned up zero in the way of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. A "Keep" result would merely perpetuate a micro-stub consisting of two lines of text sourced to a statistical database. My view is that deletion is the correct result; if GNG-level coverage is later found, there would be no bar to recreating the article at that time. Cbl62 (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of meeting our notability criteria for biographies and no apparent redirect target available Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.