Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamir Rafiq (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Aamir Rafiq (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not a notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR. I can't see lead roles or any significant work. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC) I have not paid for article dear Ravensfire i just tried my best to put all reliable source but it seems that suspision is a big issue on article made through afd editors are not searching for the article sources on google i think just giving there feedback the actor did lead roles in the project and did prominent characters in tv & films and have relevant media source on main stream media and the article on pinkvilla and its content from the heading to the last is different that why i used that for reference and pinkvilla is a mainstream media of bollywood film industry they only publish article for notable actors not for everyone i have search google news about the aamir rafiq actor its quite decent and cover by good news channel of tv and film industry he have been part of big bollywood films and did good character — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odlwcsu (talk • contribs) 15:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Keep: i believe that article has enough news sources on reliable main stream media which easily qualify {wp:actor} category and notability  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odlwcsu (talk • contribs) 16:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment see also Articles for deletion/Aamir Rafiq and Draft:Am (you'll need to view the history of the draft). ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 21:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. ManaliJain (talk) 11:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Reliable meet notable criteria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odlwcsu (talk • contribs) 18:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:TOOSOON for an article. Not enough significant roles to show WP:NACTOR, and the sources aren't there for general notability.  I did some cleanup to remove unsourced BLP and found that one article was basically used as three different sources (different publishers, one was direct copy and the other paraphrased).    Ravensfire  (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * keep not delete this is the ref link and a reliable source that proves he is a verified influencer link of his profile https://www.amazon.in/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AHUNLCJSU7BNAMD3SPFZPFDIIJOA?preview=true,he also have a verified facebook page ,and have relevant news sorces — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odlwcsu (talk • contribs) 16:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No, he has a verified profile. That's it.  He may want to call  himself an influencer, but absent solid reliable sources - not a blog, not a scraper, not a BS site, not Amazon, Wikipedia will not help puff up his resume.  Ravensfire  (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

I have been gone through various deleted projects there is a project name ahan shetty which was considered for deletion and deleted by raising he is not a known actor and not meet wp actor criteria ,he was lead actor actor in tadaap ,has various news on unlimited main stream media ,i guess no body is google about the ref and dod not add any ref hence the articke was deleted ,now i am coming to my point ,Aamir Rafiq who is famour for jhansi ki rani ,paramavtaar shri krishna ,his name in the news for these projects over and over ,those character was much liked my audience that is why i guess media news publish about him,on times of india ,pinkvilaa ,tellychakkar ,bombay times ,spotboye and many more ,the actor was seen with akshay kumar in fortune oil add and also on the cover with him on print for the same add, he has been seen in jammu & kashmir tvc which was the biggest budget add ,the actor doing projects on lead roles and parallel ,still he not a notable actor,aamir rafiq has verified social media account facebook page and verified amazon influencer,you cannot get verify untill your a notable enough ,the actor been seen doing paid partnership adds with addidas ,marks&spencers,veet,collaoborate with sarnaya umakanthan for promitimg her novel one day life will change on paid partnership on instagram. _aamir_rafiq, if hes doing alot of main stream work and did film with national and international director rupesh paul ,and did a prominent character in rocketry the nambi effect ,in penalty as cameo ,and featured in show khul ja sim sim with aman verma , and who has been the show stopper for the biggest show of nesco for brand RUSK india. Who have numerous reference, then how he fails the wp criteria and an notable criteria i strongly believe that this article should not be deleted by audience, Keep this article !.
 * Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG upcoming  a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. No indication of notability at all. No significant coverage in reliable sources. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.