Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aangan Ke Laxmi

Aangan Ke Laxmi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. In fact there not even enough sourcing ( or content) to figure out what this is about. Appears to be a mashup of two different films with similar names. Aangan Ke Laxmi and Aangan Ki Laxmi Info box says 1986 film but the only two sources that  actually discuss it are short "future film" type  pieces from a couple years ago. Found nothing in a search for Aangan Ke Laxmi North8000 (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: I think we need to hear from more editors as we have opinions to Draftify and Delete. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: It appears there have been a few mixups here. It looks like Aangan Ke Laxmi (the article title) is a 1986 film (entirely non-notable); see this mention in a book bibliography. Sources 3 and 4 in the article are referring to a film called Aangan Ki Laxmi (sometimes Aangan Ki Lakshimi), which has more coverage and was released last year. Aangan Ki Laxmi probably meets NFILM/GNG (see  and on Google). It would be helpful here if the creator (NIA3000) clarifies what exactly this article is about or if the two films are related. If it is about the 1986 film, then I vote delete. Otherwise, I am not familiar enough with the topic to decide what to do here.   C F A   💬  19:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment if the second film is notable, would Draftifying this help? Get it sorted out and publish back in mainspace with proper sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * That would be fine with me. But there's a lot to sort out, starting with the title. And there's not much to save.   North8000 (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete it doesn't meet WP rules for notability and verification. im sorry but There aren't enough reliable sources to prove its importance, and the content is minimal and incomplete. Yakov-kobi (talk) 19:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)