Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aapka Kya Hoga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Aapka Kya Hoga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable thus fails WP:NSONG Greatuser (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable song which fails notability and also there is no references as well. Torreslfchero (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

CommentThe song is very notable.can be redirected to the houseful wiki page.(Harishrawat11 (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC))


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Disambiguate This film was originally from Lawaaris (1981 film), and the Housefull version is not much different. A disambiguation page with links to both the film won't cost much. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 09:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: No notability to either of the two songs (1981s as well as this 2010s). Just because someone has been bold enough to create it does not mean we need to be dumb enough to preserve it somehow by redirects or disambiguation. §§ §§ {T/C} 03:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: on the basis of WP:NSONG which states "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". My assessment is that this article may not grow beyond stub class. Perhaps extending original article would be appropriate. Arunram (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2012‎ (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.