Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaqua (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Skomorokh 18:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Aaqua
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable website - notability is not inherited from parent organisations. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - this has been covered by multiple reliable sources. Indian Express, Linux Journal, More from Indian Express, Telegraph UK. -- Whpq (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless someone can come up with a good merge target for farming in the internet age type article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep due to sources provided by Whpq. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep – Multiple in-depth coverage from international – reliable – creditable – verifiable – 3rd party sources, as shown here . Thanks  ShoesssS Talk


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.