Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aarakocra (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. Merge anything sourced. Spartaz Humbug! 09:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Aarakocra
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional race from D&D. Significant within some campaign settings, but no evidence of real-world notability. A couple of hits on Google Scholar, but one isn't a third-party source, the is a passing mention. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see why the merge target should be here either. It will end up at AfD sooner or later. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:40, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of avian humanoids while it is not notable enough for an article, it does have at least enough mentions in RS to confirm their existence.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as above. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While I suppose I wouldn't be completely opposed to Zxcvbnm's suggestion of giving it a mention on the List of avian humanoids, I really don't feel that the one passing comment in the source brought up by the nom is enough coverage that this is necessary.  Searching for references beyond that turn up the usual collection of primary sources and mentions without any actual coverage.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: If there's to be a merge or redirect, I support it being to the D&D list, and not to the article on avian humanoids - though maybe a mention there is appropriate anyway. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.