Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aardvark (font)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Aardvark (font)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable in any way. Seems to be something made in five minutes as a possible advertisment; I'm sure that's not the case, but it looks that way. I don't see any need for this on an encyclopedia. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A Google search shows some websites that prove it is a real font. However, its not any major font like Times New Roman or anything else that might show up on Microsoft Word, ect. so I'll say delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavix (talk • contribs)
 * Delete reluctantly. It is from Font Bureau (no article?!, ah, A7'd in 2007), a major typesetting house, but there is very little in the way of sources about the font and even fewer that are independent (e.g. one offhand mention in a capsule of Pichotta's career). --Dhartung | Talk 03:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Where is the notability for this font? Artene50 (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sources provide notability for this font. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete I actually nominated this one for Speedy Delete when it first appeared online. Well, here I go again... Ecoleetage (talk) 02:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.