Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aarhus Gymnastikforening


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. (non-admin closure) -- Lord Roem (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Aarhus_Gymnastikforening
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable secondary sources. Non notable?
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 16.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  06:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - a football club who has played 65 seasons in the top flight, won the Danish league five times and participated in the quarterfinal of the European Cup is notable. I suggest the nominator read through WP:BEFORE, before nominating another article for deletion. The nominator has a point about the low quality of the article, but that is not a reason to delete it. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Bloody hell, exactly how can you decide this club is non-notable? They're a fully pro side in a fully pro league, regardless of anything else, that makes them notable. Let alone all the times they've played in the main stages of European competitions. I can see two non-primary sources in the article as well. Reliable sources will clearly exist, the article does need better sourcing, but this AfD is a farce. Trout the nominator. Lukeno94 (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Per previous comments. Club plays in the Danish top tier, the fully professional Danish Superliga. Contrary to what the nominator says, there are multiple secondary sources present in the article.  Certainly more are needed in order to improve the quality of the article, but its lack of decent sourcing does not suggest that the topic is not notable.  Bizarre nomination. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep – You gotta be kidding me. This club has been around for over 130 years and has played in a fully pro league.  And you say they're non-notable? – Michael (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.