Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Carotta (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw nomination. (non-admin closure) ManWithDrink (talk) 01:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Aaron Carotta
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe that this subject is notable. Alot of puff pieces. Alot of dead links. ManWithDrink (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinging TenPoundHammer who wrote some of his reasons here User:TenPoundHammer/AFD — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManWithDrink (talk • contribs) 21:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 12.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Can anyone please look at this AfD? Please look Thanks!. ManWithDrink (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep subject seems notable to me. Not the most notable TV producer ever but reasonable. I notice several very experienced editors have gone to town on the page to pare it down without seeking deletion, which suggests they also feel this is a viable topic originally written in a problematic way. Legacypac (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment your actually quite right Legacypac. Can I please withdraw this nomination? I didn't look at the sources clearly before. My fault. --ManWithDrink (talk) 01:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.