Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Clapham (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 07:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Aaron Clapham
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced WP:BLP, previously deleted at Articles for deletion/Aaron Clapham. I closed that one, no comment on notability of this page about same individual. -- Cirt (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Clapham will be part of the World Cup squad in South Africa, should be enough notability for now. --Ureinwohner (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added a reference confirming his inclusion in the 2010 NZ World Cup squad -- Boing!   said Zebedee  15:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as nominator of the previous AfD. He's going to the World Cup. That's notable. --Mkativerata (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I supported previous deletion but I believe he now fulfils WP:GNG with some in-depth coverage which will no doubt increase over the next couple of months. I'm happy he has now done the "if and when"-- Club Oranje T 07:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - He's been selected for the national team to play in the world cup in South Africa. It's notable enough. He's also played a fair bit for the domestic team. Nath1991 (talk) 07:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm sold!--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep We need to keep this page. A player cannot play at a higher level than the World Cup. Nzfooty (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It really saddens me that any editor upon seeing the assertions in the original unsourced article would place a BLP unsourced tag on the article and bring it here, rather than try to source it. That's the way to tear down the encyclopedia, not to build it.  DGG ( talk ) 01:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.