Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Gillego

__NOINDEX__ 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 14:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Aaron Gillego

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable. This reads like bio or resume of a person who has only had a couple of published works. The only link to this page is to his college. Clubmarx 22:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete While appears to have won some minor awards, this is a resume---and not very notable.Balloonman 00:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I see where everyone's coming from, but there are multiple sources about him, and I'm not willing to say definitively that these are all trivial sources. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears I'm the tiebreaker here. Anyways, delete per nom.  J ONATHAN  Go green ! 03:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   —Clubmarx 18:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that the main author of this article tried to remove this section and also tried to remove the afd notice from the page. Clubmarx 05:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep While it might need some cleanup, the claim of notability for a poet is not negligible. Panichappy 15:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced self-promotion; reads like a resume. Biruitorul 00:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep seriously needs cleanup and removal of name dropping and poorly sourced claims. Nevertheless, I think he squeaks over the notability bar with prominent mentions in the three articles linked at the bottom.  Eluchil404 08:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep seriously needs cleanup and removal of name dropping and poorly sourced claims. Nevertheless, I think he squeaks over the notability bar with prominent mentions in the three articles linked at the bottom.  Eluchil404 08:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.